ARL Banner
navigation bar NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Home Divisions Products and services Research projects What's new About us
Search
Online Survey

Evaluation of RAMS Turbulence Predictions over the Chesapeake Bay

Overview

Mesoscale model simulations have been compared against observed winds, temperature and moisture for various atmospheric conditions including sea breeze flows, around fronts, and in complex terrain. For this study, the utility of the ARL version of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System 3a (RAMS) for computing air pollutant deposition velocity (Vd) onto water surfaces was evaluated.The RAMS, developed at Colorado State University , was used to simulate mesoscale atmospheric circulations on two IBM/6000 workstations at ARL(McQueen, et al., 1995). Special ARL software allows the user to setup and initialize RAMS anywhere in the world using gridded meteorological fields and global land and water surface data sets. Pollutant deposition onto water is dependent on the heat and moisture fluxes from the surface and by several turbulence variables, therefore these parameters were evaluated along with the atmospheric state variables.

Valigura (1995) estimated heat fluxes over the Chesapeake Bay to compute deposition velocity of nitric acid (HNO3) by using measurements at several levels from specially designed buoys. This database was used to evaluate various RAMS flux and turbulence variables, over the Chesapeake Bay Observing System (CBOS) buoy. These results helped determine the RAMS settings needed to predict parameters that control coastal dispersion and deposition over the water accurately. An objective trajectory cluster analysis formed the basis of the criteria used to select cases for study in this investigation. The trajectories beginning at each altitude were clustered separately following Stunder (1996).

Click HERE for a gif movie of a 2 km RAMS Chesapeake Bay simulation.

Research Results

This study examined the ability of a mesoscale model to compute surface turbulence and flux variables over water with the accuracy needed for air pollution studies. Sensible heat fluxes and deposition velocities (Fig. 1) compared well with observations when the model horizontal resolution was reduced to 5 km or less and the first model level were 12 m. Other turbulent variables compared poorly especially under stable stratifications.

Heat Flux Vd

Figure 1. Sensible heat flux (left) and deposition velocity (right) time-series for various horizontal resolution experiments.

Overall, latent heat fluxes were significantly underpredicted even with finer resolutions. Results degraded when the effects of clouds on short- and long-wave radiation were incorporated. Latent fluxes were also insensitive to increasing the initial sea surface temperature (SST) over the observed daytime range (1 C), and to using an improved roughness length parameterization over water. Errors were much larger during stably stratified conditions, therefore, substantial underprediction of pollutants to the bay would be expected by RAMS during these conditions. However, RAMS would be a reliable predictor of fluxes and deposition velocity during unstable conditions.

Further experiments were performed to help explain the poor predictions during the daytime for stable conditions. Latent heat fluxes over water were strongly sensitive to the soil moisture content of the surrounding land masses for stable atmospheric conditions and improved when geostrophic forcing terms were added to the momentum equations (Fig. 2).

Latent Flux
Figure 2. Latent heat flux time-series averaged for all stably stratified case.

References

McQueen, J.T., R.A. Valigura and B.J.B. Stunder, 1997: Evaluation of the RAMS Model for estimating deposition velocity onto the Chesapeake Bay. Atmos. Envir., (In Press).

McQueen, J.T., R.A. Valigura and B.J.B. Stunder, 1997: Evaluation of surface flux and turbulence predictions over the Chesapeake Bay from a mesoscale model,13th Conference on Hydrology. 77th Meeting of the Amer. Meteor. Soc., Long Beach, CA, 62-65.

McQueen, J.T., R.R. Draxler and G.D. Rolph, 1995: Influence of grid size and terrain resolution on wind field predictions from an operational mesoscale model. J. Appl. Meteor. ,34, 2166-2181.

Stunder, B.J.B., 1996: An assessment of the quality of forecast trajectories. J. Appl. Meteor., 35, 1319-1331.

Valigura, R.A., 1995: Iterative bulk exchange model for estimating air-water transfer of HNO3. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26045-26050.

Link footer Air Resources Laboratory NOAA Research NOAA